I really liked this book; seriously, I liked it about as
much as I did The Help and the film Argo. Three days after I finished the novel,
I was still thinking about Marie-Laure, her father, her uncle, all the
characters really. I thought about their choices and admired their integrity or
repulsed at their lack of. All the Light
We Cannot See is a book that broadened my perspective and has jumped to the
top of my best reads list.
This book has been rather difficult for me to write a review
about. Not because it wasn’t thought provoking or well written, but because it
was a personal experience and those feelings are difficult to verbalize. I saw
a bit of myself in each of the characters and felt the book was more than
nouns, conjugations, and adjectives. Speaking of adjectives, there was quite a
bit of descriptive and expressive language in the book. I’ve speculated that
this could partially be because one of the main characters is blind and so
verbal descriptions are very important to her.
In addition to descriptive and potentially “flowery”
language, the novel’s structure reminded me a bit of a romantic era work. The
timeline is structured as separate threads of the novel’s tapestry, each
chapter an individual character’s past or present.
It moves between about five
frames of reference. The separate characters’ stories converge because of a
mythical tale and curse attached to a priceless diamond. The diamond is
attributed supernatural abilities and as the reader I often wondered how I
would respond if placed in the characters’ circumstances.
The two most prominent characters are Marie-Laure, a young
blind French girl, and Werner a bright young man caught in the crossfire of the
third Reich. Radio broadcasts and the allegedly cursed diamond bring them
together in an occupied French seaside city.
The novel isn’t a love story or a history of WWII. It’s a
deeper inspection of values, courage, and the importance of communication.
PS: Pseudo-Intellectual Thoughts
I’ve decided to include my thoughts on the character I
couldn’t get my mind off of, Frederick. Frederick, the innocent youth who loved
birds and hid his glasses. His story contains an integral inspection of courage
and moral values. This inspection can be seen through the author’s use of vampirism.
First I’ll explain where my ideas about this vampirism
came. Several days before I finished the novel I was helping my brother with an
AP Literature assignment. The topic was vampirism and I explained it as
exploitation of a character. Dracula comes into a story, his victim a youth,
and Dracula exploits the victim’s youth/innocence/desirable trait and
essentially makes them like himself. The victim becoming the next vampire. To
me, vampirism isn’t just the exploitation of youth. It’s also when an outside
corrupted source takes with force and corrupts the victim. I see vampirism in
Frederick’s story.
The vampires in Frederick’s story are the boys surrounding
him at the Nazi-Soldier-in-Training-School. The majority of these boys are the
product of Hitler Youth and, with the encouragement of their leaders, torments
those who are different. Frederick is different because he cannot run fast; his
eyesight is poor, and his non-Nazi like sensitivity. Frederick is the innocent
gentle youth that the vampire could not corrupt. Because the corrupted boys could
neither change Frederick’s morals nor his mind, they had to contaminate him
another way. If they could not drag him down in ideology, then they would drag
him down physically. They beat him literally within an inch of his life,
forcing his body to become damaged like their minds.
From Frederick’s story I choose not to just see it solely as an example of vampirism. I
choose to see a bright youth who resisted the exploitation and corruption
surrounding him. I see the potential victim resisting the ideology of the Third
Reich. At some point in the novel Frederick says something to the effect of
“You think we have a choice? We don’t have a choice.” The irony is that
Frederick makes his own choices, resisting even when he thinks he has given in.
I highly recommend this book, but with the caution that
there is a “brief and very vague” rape scene (which is about one page of the
500 something).
No comments:
Post a Comment